Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping.

TitleRapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsJafari R, Sheth S, Spincemaille P, Nguyen TD, Prince MR, Wen Y, Guo Y, Deh K, Liu Z, Margolis D, Brittenham GM, Kierans AS, Wang Y
JournalJ Magn Reson Imaging
Volume50
Issue3
Pagination725-732
Date Published2019 09
ISSN1522-2586
KeywordsFeasibility Studies, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Iron, Iron Overload, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is needed to guide iron-chelating therapy for patients with transfusional iron overload. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of automated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to measure the LIC.

PURPOSE: To develop a rapid, robust, and automated liver QSM for clinical practice.

STUDY TYPE: Prospective.

POPULATION: 13 healthy subjects and 22 patients.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 1.5 T and 3 T/3D multiecho gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence.

ASSESSMENT: Data were acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with an out-of-phase echo spacing with respect to each other. All odd echoes that were in-phase (IP) were used to initialize the fat-water separation and field estimation (T2 *-IDEAL) before performing QSM. Liver QSM was generated through an automated pipeline without manual intervention. This IP echo-based initialization method was compared with an existing graph cuts initialization method (simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift, SPURS) in healthy subjects (n = 5). Reproducibility was assessed over four scanners at two field strengths from two manufacturers using healthy subjects (n = 8). Clinical feasibility was evaluated in patients (n = 22).

STATISTICAL TESTS: IP and SPURS initialization methods in both healthy subjects and patients were compared using paired t-test and linear regression analysis to assess processing time and region of interest (ROI) measurements. Reproducibility of QSM, R2 *, and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) among the four different scanners was assessed using linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS: Liver QSM using the IP method was found to be ~5.5 times faster than SPURS (P < 0.05) in initializing T2 *-IDEAL with similar outputs. Liver QSM using the IP method were reproducibly generated in all four scanners (average coefficient of determination 0.95, average slope 0.90, average bias 0.002 ppm, 95% limits of agreement between -0.06 to 0.07 ppm, ICC 0.97).

DATA CONCLUSION: Use of IP echo-based initialization enables robust water/fat separation and field estimation for automated, rapid, and reproducible liver QSM for clinical applications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:725-732.

DOI10.1002/jmri.26632
Alternate JournalJ Magn Reson Imaging
PubMed ID30637892
PubMed Central IDPMC6929208
Grant ListR01 NS095562 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 NS090464 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 DK116126 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA181566 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States